Valuations key to avoiding NALI restrictions
SMSF trustees may find properties within their fund caught under changes to non-arm’s length income rules if the property is involved in a related-party transaction and is not professionally valued, according to a leading SMSF law firm.

Speaking at a seminar in Sydney on Wednesday, DBA Lawyers’ Shaun Backhaus said it was important that trustees and their advisers not rely on informal valuations from real estate agents if they were acquiring or disposing of a property through a related party.
“When you get the real estate agent’s appraisal, it’s typically going to be a two- or three-line letter saying, ‘Based on my appraisal, the value is this’,” Mr Backhaus said.
“I would bet that half the time, there’s also an email or text message going to your client or, even worse, you, saying, ‘How much do you want me to make this?’ So, I think that’s not really going to cut it.”
Mr Backhaus explained that in disputed cases — such as when there was a suspicion that a property had been acquired from or by a related party at less than market value — the ATO would review the instructions given to the valuer by the trustee or adviser.
If the transaction was found not to have occurred at arm’s length, income earned from the property would be subject to 45 per cent tax as per the new measures currently before parliament.
Even those who had been diligent in their instructions to their real estate agent could be caught if the valuation did not appear to be “based on objective and supportable data” as per the ATO’s guidance on the issue, Mr Backhaus said.
“If there’s an acquisition from a related party and all you’ve got is that agent appraisal and [the value has] shot up later, the ATO could say, ‘No, based on these things in the media which the agent didn’t take into account, the value should have been more’,” he said.
“I recognise clients aren’t going to want to get a $2,000 appraisal very often, but if there are any related-party transactions involved, they need to get a valuation.”
Sarah Kendell
14 August 2019
smsfadviser.com
Hot Issues
- Five steps towards a more confident retirement
- Financial literacy in Australia: Where we're improving (and falling behind)
- CSLR levy on SMSFs unfair
- SMSF pension shortfall – when can trustees self-assess?
- How to turn your annual SMSF investment strategy review into a genuine analytical exercise
- Super viewed as mortgage solution
- Tokenisation to change SMSF landscape
- Check out the largest castles by country
- ATO’s LRBA data significantly less than industry figures
- New deeming thresholds could deliver small part age pension
- Can I still get the Age Pension if my super is healthy?
- New to SMSFs? Start preparing for your first SAR lodgment
- Contribution splitting now more valuable
- Six ways Gen X can build retirement savings
- How to maximise the impact of your inheritance
- How Our Diets have Changed.
- Adequate retirement savings misjudged
- The SBSCH will close from 1 July 2026
- Complications of maintaining two cost bases in Div 296
- What the Payday Super changes mean for your retirement
- investment and economic outlook 2026
- Rules apply to gifting in superannuation
- Record SMSF growth driven by digital access
- The evolution of the world's languages
Article archive
- April - June 2026
- January - March 2026
- October - December 2025
- July - September 2025
- April - June 2025
- January - March 2025
- October - December 2024
- July - September 2024
- April - June 2024
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
